Thursday, July 2, 2015

Mayor hits tree

Mayor hits tree


Miami Lakes  Mayor Pizzi

hit a big  tree

and the air bag deployed 

after  visiting a bar.

But obviously annoyed, 

implied  it wasn't he

driving the car.

Who woulda thunk

a robot could get drunk?

hzl
7/2/15


  1. Miami Lakes Mayor Michael Pizzi Crashes Car - NBC 6 ...

    Jun 16, 2015 - Police say Miami Lakes mayor Michael Pizzi left the scene of a crash after his car hit a tree Monday night. ... According to the police report, Pizzi drove his Kia into a tree, causing the airbag deploy, then left the ... Entertainment · Entertainment News · The Scene · Events · 6 in the Mix · Latin Beat · COZI TV.

  • 911 call released of Miami Lakes mayor's crash with tree ...

    6 days ago - A South Florida mayor went on a dangerous drive, and a 911 caller witnessed ... 911: "OK, so the guy hit the tree, and he left running on foot?".
  • Miami Lakes mayor crashes into tree after avoiding animal ...

    Jun 16, 2015 - Miami Lakes Mayor Michael Pizzi suffered a minor head injury after crashing into a tree in a residential enclave, Miami-Dade police said.
  • CHRIS CHRISTIE'S WORLD












    Chris Christie's World

    PAINT MISBEHAVIN' DEPT.
    mad magazine chris christie's world andrew wyeth christina's world
    Writer: J.C. Duffy
    Artist: Richard Williams
    From MAD #534, August 2015
    Get more stupidity delivered right to your mailbox! Subscribe to MAD today!​





















    CHRIS:

    i  PROMISE TO GO MANO A MANO WITH  PUTIN

    INSTEAD OF RISKY NUCLEAR MISSILE SHOOTIN'

    AND I'LL ALSO  TIE UP THE RUSSIAN MAFIA

    IN LOTS AND LOTS OF TRAFFIA.

    BUT AS FOR THAT OTHER ONE TIME JERSEY GUY

    WHO ALSO AIN'T NOTED FOR BEING SHY.

    BUT  BEING  RESPLENDENTLY ATTIRED

    WITH A PENCHANT FOR GETTING PEOPLE FIRED---

     HE'S JUST HELPED TURN ATLANTIC CITY INTO A DUMP:

    SO YOU'D BETTER  NOT VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP.

    HZL
    7/2/15

    Wednesday, July 1, 2015

    Skin Danger from the Sun




     

    With Summer Sun Come Signs of Danger

    Photo
    CreditPaul Rogers
    Personal Health
    PERSONAL HEALTH
    Jane Brody on health and aging.




    With summer sun shining brightly across the United States (at least on most days), there is no better time to review the latest sobering findings on the damage that ultraviolet radiation can inflict on one’s skin and then take steps to prevent it.

    Skin Danger from the Sun

    Energy from the  Sun is the source of life

    but it is also a source of danger

    when  Its penetrating rays slice like a knife

    to becoming a molecule dis-arranger

    causing mutations

    and cellular aberrations

    like some  whirling malignant  dancer.

    that ultimately bring cancer




    So, if there is one simple lesson those older can teach

    it's 'cover up well when on the beach'

    or here's a simpler  bet for  woman and  man:

    Never, ever, try to  get a sun tan.

    Stay pale  matter how  it may your mirror dismay,

    you'll be  much better off in fifty shades of gray. 

    hzl
    7/1/15

    (PS: Written one day after MOHS surgery, my third such and counting...))

    A British research team reported in May in the journal Science that a quarter or more of cells in the skin of middle-aged people have suffered sun-induced DNA damage. Although the cells were outwardly normal, the mutations that occurred could be the first stages of cancer.
    The researchers, led by Dr. Peter J. Campbell, a cancer geneticist at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in England, examined the eyelid skin of four middle-aged adults — three were Western European and one was of South Asian descent — and found that hundreds of ostensibly normal cells had mutations linked to cancer, a number “way higher than we’d expect,” Dr. Campbell said. Clusters of these mutant cells, called clones, appeared in every 0.1 square inch of skin, with thousands of DNA mutations in each cell.
    Although it is not known if the same rate of mutations occurs in sun-exposed skin elsewhere on the body, or in people of different ethnic backgrounds, or even how many of the mutations would progress to cancer, it is not a finding to dismiss lightly.
    Douglas E. Brash, a biophysicist at Yale University School of Medicine who has studied ultraviolet damage to cells for more than 40 years and wrote a commentary on the British study, described the new findings as “a canary in a coal mine” and a warning to take the effects of ultraviolet radiation, whether from sunlight or tanning beds, more seriously.
    It is especially important, he said, “to be very conscientious about protecting young children,” who are more susceptible than teenagers and adults to ultraviolet-induced mutations.
    “A lot of damage occurs when people go to the beach,” Dr. Brash said. “While the body does a great job of repairing the damage and gets 99.9 percent of things right, every once in a while, you do get a mutation that may make a cell resistant to death, allowing it to form a clone that can become a cancer.”
    Complicating the matter is that many people don’t understand the meaning of the S.P.F. rating listed on modern sunscreens — only 43 percent of 114 people surveyed at a dermatology clinic in Illinois last summer, according to a study in JAMA Dermatology. The rating, which stands for sun protection factor, is meant to reflect how well a product protects against sunburn, which should also reduce the risk of skin cancer and sun-induced skin aging. And less than a third of people use sunscreen regularly, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    Dermatologists have long cautioned people not to rely too heavily on sunscreens, even products with the recommended S.P.F. rating of 30 or higher for summer sun protection. Few people who do use sunscreen use enough to achieve the level of protection measured in the laboratory, and few reapply it often enough. A better plan is to stay out of the sun, especially midday, and cover the skin when sun exposure is unavoidable.
    Furthermore, a recently published study by Dr. Brash’s team at Yaleshowed that much of the harm to skin cells caused by ultraviolet radiation occurs hours after the exposure has ended. Even in the dark, substances formed during UV exposure continue to damage melanin, the pigment that gives skin its color, “exciting electrons, the energy from which gets transferred to DNA and can damage it in the same way that UV photons do,” Dr. Brash explained.
    The British researchers chose eyelid skin for their study because it is readily available from an operation called blepharoplasty to remove drooping upper eyelids. Using a sophisticated technique called ultradeep sequencing, the researchers analyzed 234 biopsies from normal skin tissue for 74 cancer genes, and found a level of mutations “similar to that seen in many cancers.” A lot of the genetic changes they found resulted in what is called “driver mutations” that are capable of forming clones, a major step toward forming cancers.
    Dr. Brash said skin on the hands, arms, cheeks and ears is likely to be even more heavily exposed to UV radiation than eyelid skin, and thus may have even higher levels of mutations, since the eyelids are shaded in part by the eye socket and sometimes sunglasses.
    Nearly 25 years ago, Dr. Brash and his co-workers reported that UV light induced mutations in the critically important tumor suppressor gene called p53. They examined squamous cell skin cancers from 24 patients in New England and Sweden and found that 58 percent had mutations in p53, including a particular change in DNA structure “unique to UV.”
    “You can’t buy a cream to get rid of mutations, so the best approach is to prevent the damage,” Dr. Brash said. “The new study presents a graphic picture of what’s going on in our skin, and might convince people to put on sunscreen and stay off the beach between 10 and 2.”
    In its latest analysis of 1,000 commercially available sunscreens, the Environmental Working Group, a consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, rated sunscreens made with zinc oxide or titanium oxide high because “they provide strong sun protection with few health concerns” and “they don’t break down in the sun.” These substances are also more protective than other sunscreen ingredients against UVA rays, which can cause aging of the skin and immune suppression and characteristic sun-induced mutations in skin cells. The group’s complete 2015 sunscreen guide is available online at ewg.org/2015sunscreen.
    Some consumers erroneously believe that choosing a more expensive sunscreen with a sky-high S.P.F. number like 70 or 100 will provide complete protection. However, the Food and Drug Administration has not determined that an S.P.F. of more than 50 has any added benefits.

    Related:
    For more fitness, food and wellness news, “like” ourFacebook page.

    Tuesday, June 30, 2015

    ANOTHER SPORTS ICON IN TROUBLE?



    Phil Mickelson’s 1st and most important step to save his image

    Phil Mickelson needs to offer an explanation. Not necessarily a confession, but an explanation as to why his name keeps coming up in relation to federal investigations of unsavory people.
    Last year, the five-time major winner and one of the PGA Tour’s most popular players, was connected to a federal investigation of insider trading. He was cleared of any wrongdoing and the issue was largely forgottenuntil Monday. That’s when an ESPN report cited court documents and sources linking Mickelson to an illegal gambling operation which accepted and placed bets on sporting events.
    Mickelson, according to the report, is alleged to have transferred nearly $3 million to an intermediary of an offshore gambling operation. Gregory Silveira, of La Quinta, Calif., pleaded guilty to three counts of money laundering of funds from an unnamed “gambling client” between Feb. 2010 and Feb. 2013.
    Mickelson was not named in court documents, but according to ESPN, sources familiar with the case indicated Mickelson is the “gambling client.”
    Mickelson isn’t expected to be charged with a crime. Still, guilt by association is starting to cast a darkening cloud over Mickelson’s image. If Mickelson wants to lose $3 million gambling, it’s his American right to do so. But this association with a money launderer doesn’t feel right for someone whose endorsement deals are largely built around his wholesome image. Mickelson needs to explain why we shouldn’t think the worst.
    No one has been better for golf over the last two decades than Mickelson. Now 45, he became a sympathetic figure during the rise of Tiger Woods as Mickelson failed to win any of golf’s major championships until the 2004 Masters. He has since won the 2006 and 2010 Masters along with the 2005 PGA Championship and the 2013 British Open. He has finished second in the U.S. Open a record six times.
    But while Woods was aloof, Mickelson embraced his galleries. He was consistently accommodating to media, and no athlete was admired more than Mickelson when he stood by his courageous wife, Amy, and his mother during their public battles with breast cancer.
    While newcomers like 2015 Masters and U.S. Open champion Jordan Spieth and four-time major winner Rory McIlroy have emerged as the new generation of golf stars, Mickelson’s role as the elder statesman will be important as his career moves into his senior years. He will be revered the way aging legends Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer are today if he protects his image.
    It is well-known Mickelson doesn’t mind a good money match on the course and in past years his interest in wagering on NFL games was part of his appeal. It was and continues to be mostly good-natured stuff. But there were also unsubstantiated rumors his move from Titlelist to Callaway in 2004 was instigated by Callaway paying off Mickelson’s gambling debts, and there were crazy rumors of Mickelson losing $200,000 during a recent round with members at Augusta National.
    It’s hard to know what’s truth and what’s fiction, which is why we need to hear from Phil. If the $3 million was nothing more than just some harmless recreation then, who are we to judge? He has won more than $75 million during his career on the PGA Tour, and annually earns more than $40 million in endorsements. He is known to be generous and charitable. He’s also not the first highly paid professional athlete to lose millions gambling and he won’t be the last. If anything, Mickelson should at least find better gambling partners or stick to Las Vegas where it’s legal and the state could use the revenue. Otherwise, it’s hard to shake the feeling one of golf’s biggest stars might be hurting his legacy.
    Woods will be forever scarred by his sex scandal made more infamous because he was packaged as the ideal father-husband-athlete. Mickelson has that image, too. But he needs to explain why we shouldn’t think otherwise.

    ANOTHER SPORTS ICON IN TROUBLE?
    Putting a ball in a hole 

    however expertly 

    almost all the time

    is not in itself a crime  

    as if someone stole

    rather desperately.


    Moreover the image of golfing

    is  Anglo Saxon

    once played by men in knickers woolen

    though more often today  with slacks on. 



    So therefore it needs  to be understood:

    and reasonably quickly,

    how could it be 

    that men are now  involved from another ancient neighborhood--

    wearing perhaps even more expensive clothes--

     with speech often sprinkled by dems and dose?

    hzl
    6/30/15



    Report: Phil Mickelson linked with illegal $3 million gambling scheme

    GTY 456023016 S SPO GLF GBR SC
    1.2kSHARES
     SHARE
     TWEET
     EMAIL
    By:  | June 29, 2015 2:50 pm
    A report from ESPN’s Outside the Lines on Monday has linked golfer Phil Mickelson with a nearly $3 million sports-betting scheme tied to an “illegal gambling operation” based outside the United States. The report, which is based on court documents and various sources, notes that Mickelson has not been charged for his alleged involvement nor is he under federal investigation, but adds the man who reportedly handled his money pled guilty last week.
    According to the article:
    A 56-year-old former sports gambling handicapper, acting as a conduit for an offshore gambling operation, pleaded guilty last week to laundering approximately $2.75 million of money that two sources told Outside the Lines belonged to Mickelson.
    Gregory Silveira of La Quinta reached an agreement with prosecutors and pleaded guilty to three counts of money laundering of funds from an unnamed “gambling client” of his between February 2010 and February 2013. Sources familiar with the case said Mickelson, who was not named in court documents, is the unnamed “gambling client.” Silveira is scheduled to be sentenced Oct. 5 before U.S. District Court Judge Virginia A. Phillips and faces up to 60 years in prison, though the sentence will likely be far shorter.


    Mickelson had no comment, according to his public relations manager, T.R. Reinman. PGA Tour Vice President Ty Votaw also declined to comment.
    1. Long known as a gambler on the course, Phil Mickelson now has his name linked to illegal gambling off it. According to a report published ...
    2. More news for phil mickelson gambling callaway

    3. Mickelson gambling stories make rounds again | San Diego ...

      www.sandiegoreader.com/.../mickelson-gambling-stori...
      San Diego Reader
      Jan 25, 2013 - Callaway found he was a gambler, but had no outstanding debts ...sports press has talked about golfer Phil Mickelson's gambling proclivities.
    4. The Gambler: Phil Mickelson Made Paul Azinger Pay Dearly

      www.back9network.com/.../the-gambler-phil-mickelson-...
      Back9Network
      May 23, 2014 - The GamblerPhil Mickelson Made Paul Azinger Pay Dearly ... to speculation that he signed with Callaway Golf due to a large gambling debt.